ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ

Authors

Pramila Shakya, Kirtipur Hospital
Lia Pattinson, Christine Couhig and David Sainsbury, Cleft Lip and Palate Service, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Mekonen Eshete, Yekakit 12 Hospital Medical College
Ashu Gandhi, Consultant Breast & Endocrine Surgeon

The Importance of Early Identification of a Cleft Palate

This blogs explains why a cleft palate should be identified at birth, how it can be identified and what the problems are with late detection. We aim to provide a perspective from the UK and low and middle income countries such as Nepal and Ethiopia. 

A cleft palate is a congenital condition occurring when the tissues of the roof of the mouth, also known as the palate, do not fuse together during fetal development. This can result in a gap or opening in the palate, which can affect the ability to eat, speak, and breathe. It is one of the commonest congenital conditions in the world, with an approximate overall incidence of 1 in 1300 births (1).

How to Identify a Cleft Palate in a Newborn Baby 

It is recommended that those performing a newborn baby examination should not only perform a finger-assisted palpation of the intraoral structures but crucially directly visualise the oral cavity from the gingiva (gums) to uvula using a wooden tongue depressor and light (such as a pen torch). Diagnosis is therefore possible immediately after birth and is recognised as a national minimum standard of care by cleft services in the UK, with ongoing referral to the local cleft team within 24 hours of diagnosis.  

Diagnosis of a cleft palate after 24 hours following a birth in the UK is considered delayed. Indeed, this standard, that all cleft palates should be diagnosed at within 24 hours of birth, has never been achieved in the UK.  

In September 2017 the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) launched an eLearning module with the aim of improving the early identification of cleft palate. Prior to this up to a third of all babies born with a cleft palate were not identified in the first 24-48 hours following birth.  

Six key recommendations  

  • Healthcare professionals should examine a baby’s hard and soft palate as part of the full newborn physical examination and record this in the child’s health record.  

  • Examination of the baby’s palate should be carried out by direct visual inspection.  

  • A torch and method of depressing the tongue should be used to visualise the whole palate.  

  • Parents should be informed if the whole palate (including the full length of the soft palate) has not been visualised during the newborn examination. This should also be recorded in the child’s health record.  

  • If the whole palate is unable to be visually inspected at the first attempt then a further attempt at visual examination should be made within 24 hours.  

  • Trusts and hospitals should provide training on the correct method of visual inspection of the palate to all healthcare professionals required to carry out the newborn examination.  

 

Why it Important to Identify a Cleft Palate in a Newborn Baby 

 

Most babies with a cleft palate experience feeding difficulty with the coordination and transfer of milk required for adequate feeding. These babies often have nasal regurgitation (milk coming out of the nostrils whilst feeding), excessive air intake, prolonged feeding times, difficulty creating enough suction to pull milk from a standard bottle or the breast, decreased volume intake, and tire before the oral feed is concluded.   

The longer the delay in the detection of a cleft palate, the greater potential for faltering growth2. There may also be readmissions to hospital because of poor feeding and poor weight gain. There is a risk of choking with aspiration and secondary pneumonia, and in the longer term, middle ear infections and hearing impairment.  A delay in detection may also lead to delay in surgery and therefore effect the speech outcomes with respect to velopharyngeal function.  

The (CLAPA; a UK based charity supporting people born with a cleft and their families) reported that delays in detecting cleft palate cost the UK’s NHS £250,000 in legal fees alone, highlighting the significant financial implications of late diagnosis.  

Additionally, the cost to families in the form of emotional and psychological distress remains with them throughout the years of follow-up. Where a diagnosis is delayed following parents repeated concerns to health professionals, there is an inevitable weakening of the doctor-patient relationship and a lack of trust. 

“If the cleft palate was not detected what else may have been missedâ€Å¨¶Ä¯ 

“I knew something was wrong, but no one looked in her mouthâ€Å¨¶Ä¯ 

“I was told that nasal regurgitation of milk was normalâ€Å¨¶Ä¯ 

"I just wasn't able to feed him and give him that important nourishment that he needed.  

And that is very hard. You start blaming yourself, thinking I must be doing something wrong, there's something wrong with my childâ€Å¨¶Ä¯ 

This lack of awareness from professionals is difficult for new mothers to overcome and often leaves them feeling isolated and frustrated.  

The commonest condition to be associated with a cleft palate is Pierre-Robin Sequence (PRS). PRS is usually detected at birth because these babies can be born with an unusually small chin (micrognathia). These babies often experience breathing difficulties and therefore it is imperative that the palate is visualised due to increased risk of upper airway obstruction.  

 

Perspectives of Cleft Palate Detection and Management in Low and  Middle Income Countries 

Having discussed and highlighted the importance of identifying a cleft palate in the UK as soon as possible after birth,  there is a noted disparity in lower middle income countries regarding cleft detection. The impact of this on babies and families can be catastrophic, often due to a shortage of trained professionals and inaccessible cleft care. As a result of the cleft palate not being identified at birth, they have a risk of malnourishment and potential death.   

 

Nepal 

In low and middle incomes countries, including Nepal, there may be patients living in isolated areas or in places with difficult terrain with little or no access to the expert medical care and minimal awareness regarding the consequences of the delayed detection of surgical repair of a cleft palate. Consequently, some patients may not be diagnosed at the time of birth and only diagnosed when they have persistent feeding problems, faltering growth or problem with the clarity of speech. Some parents believe surgery should be deferred as they are scared of their children undergoing surgery at a young age. Patients may then come for palate surgery in adulthood when they realize their speech is not good enough, there is difficulty in communication and palatal surgery can improve the speech. Socioeconomic condition of the families may result in a delay of palate repair as it is may not be the first priority when daily activities are need for survival.   

  

Ethiopia 

In Ethiopia, there is no neonatal screening program, and structured neonatal physical examinations are not routinely practiced. In addition, a large proportion of deliveries are unattended, and traditional birth attendants assist many. These factors contribute to the delayed diagnosis of birth defects such as isolated cleft palate, hypospadias, minor clubfoot, and other anomalies that are not immediately visible at birth. At Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, which serves as the main cleft care centre for the entire country, only 94 children with isolated cleft palate were operated on over 19 years. The majority (71%) underwent surgery after the age of two years. When we interviewed mothers about the reasons for delayed presentation, most explained that they were unaware their child had such a condition. Many reported taking their child to a health facility for complaints such as ear discharge, where treatment was provided, but no one examined the child’s mouth. Families often sought care only when the child failed to develop normal speech.  

We believe the number of isolated cleft palate cases that reached treatment was very few, and it is likely that many affected children died before being diagnosed. In our opinion and observation, the main reasons for delayed diagnosis are the absence of structured neonatal physical examinations and the high proportion of unattended deliveries. Introducing proper physical examination of newborns before discharge will play a significant role in improving the care of children born with birth defects. It should be considered an essential component of routine newborn care. Each body system must be carefully assessed for signs of normal function and health, while healthcare providers remain vigilant for indicators of illness or congenital anomalies. Such an approach would enable the timely identification and management of birth conditions, including isolated cleft palate, hypospadias, and clubfoot, among others. Although comprehensive newborn screening is ideal, it is not feasible in Ethiopia due to resource constraints. However, many treatable anomalies can be detected through systematic physical examination with a checklist.  

  

Conclusion  

 

It is highlighted throughout this blog, the importance of early detection of a cleft palate in both the UK and in low and middle income countries. Evidence indicates that collaborative working should be prioritised to support cleft healthcare worldwide. This reflects the philosophy of (a UK based cleft charity) which aims to provide long term, sustainable ways to bridge the gap in cleft care and knowledge in the UK and overseas.  


References

1. Salari N, Darvishi N, Heydari M, Bokaee S, Darvishi F, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;123(2):110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 24. PMID: 34033944. 

 2. Maraka J, Butterworth S, Sainsbury D, Hodgkinson P. Growth concerns in the early weeks of life: don't forget the palate. BMJ. 2020 Nov 3;371:m4255. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4255. PMID: 33144343.